? Nantong Media Arts exam training have learned it Nanjing Phoenix Arts test (: URL: www.fhcmedu.com www.fhykpx.com) Points and director of professional film critics writing a proposal Highlights: Mastering critics write routines for no systematic analysis studied film theory The students, the university does not require students to have a very theoretical exposition, the key is to seek the truth, to write the true feelings of the candidates, the most taboo others, and not assertive. For example, candidates may have seen or others related content introduction, the work comments on the movie, blindly quote someone else's idea is not high in the prior review. Secondly, the expression must system. For example, when the expression "like" The bottom line is evidence that lists reasons. Avoid vague to preach. In addition, it should be possible from a positive perspective of the film's themes. Recommendation: master a set of routines written critics (of the following methods for reference): beginning with a brief words will generalize the basic content of the film; the second part, write your own Feedback, consider what the theme of the movie is; first three parts, what artistic style is to write the movie; and finally summarized. It should be noted that the theme of the movie should be unity and artistic style. Two points: the most taboo were fabrications proposition creation, avoid fabrications. Candidates should be from the reality of life, feeling. This part mainly on three factors: writing skills, the idea of ??capacity (imagination) and the ability to control the story. To take advantage of the task set plot, conflict, rendering, and bedding and other techniques to start writing. Candidates should try to write the play from the side of the little things. To focused story, the characters, the characters emotions work hard in order to love moving. To have a sense of the screen to write text that advocate detail description. For example, to a place that can describe the environment. When writing the character, you can through his clothes, dress, facial expressions, etc. to serve as a character. Recommendation: Candidates use the first person to write a story, relatively easy to grasp. Exam one week you can see some mature miniature novels, such as "story", "reader", the formation of the concept of writing stories. In addition, before the exam, you should have ready conscious of two articles written characters. Highlights three: Look literary popular books for high school students, the university does not require candidates at some point very deep, but the candidates for the arts must be a wide range of knowledge, for example, for a given area to be aware of what the master. At the same time the exam is based on objectivity with basic knowledge-based, supplemented by thinking of common sense. Candidates must be able to talk about some of the problems that feeling. Like right now to see how many talent show and so on. How to write a piece of analysis looking to see films analysis, is to let the candidates to watch television in a video or CD-ROM, and then required to write articles. How to write a good-looking piece of analysis? Do not write Feedback. Nice piece of writing analytical articles, the key lies in the ability to accurately grasp the article genre. Candidates made most of the problems, is moderation inappropriate and did not meet the test requirements of the genre or not, put it into their feelings and experiences, they thought of. This score is not high. Recommendation: The first is the different genres of the article. Feedback, and experience a fundamental part of Shuqing Wen articles category, lyrical concentrated; while watching films analysis is literary criticism, is argumentative category, strong color theory. The former focuses on the sense, while the latter focuses on recommendations. The former often emotions sentences, such as "after reading this work I was very moved," "I am very angry," "I'm emotionally" and the like; and the latter attitude is cold, usually with a variety of arguments means narrative clip Yee, analyzed and discussed, rather than the pursuit of emotional and "literary talent." Followed by different authors identity. Feedback writing, the author's identity is a general audience; see films written analysis, the author's identity has become a "commentator" and "insiders" or at least should be a "quasi-TV people" will be possible to enter the TV industry reserve team. Is the target for the different again. Feedback for the "it", that the content of the work; Second, look for a piece of analysis is "the film", that is the work itself. The former question to answer is: Do you know what do you think after this incident? What it gives you inspiration? The answer to the latter question is, how to understand this work? Where more successful? Finally, the different focus of the article. Feedback focuses on the ideological content of the work, focusing on the significance of education; and see the film focuses on analysis of the creative experience of works, including art form. The former requires concentrate on the theme, with practice and express feelings; while the latter requires creative features closely analyzed the effect of expression, how to analyze it in the form of content services.